Various cookies are used on our website: technical cookies, cookies for marketing purposes and cookies for analysis purposes; in principle, you can also visit our website without cookies being set. This does not apply to technically necessary cookies. You can view and change the current settings at any time by clicking on the fingerprint that appears (bottom left). You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time. Further information can be found in our privacy policy under Cookies. By clicking on "Accept all", you agree that we may set the aforementioned cookies for marketing and analysis purposes.

The picture shows a lawyer and a plaintiff looking at court documents. A court has now ruled that a Residence permit can be extended even if an asylum application has been rejected.

Court: Residence permit can be extended despite rejected asylum application

In July 2025, the Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) in Leipzig issued a ruling that is important for many people with a residence permit in Germany. The court ruled that an existing residence permit can be extended - even if an asylum application was previously rejected as unfounded. Section 10 (3) of the Residence Act, which is often applied in such cases, does not apply here. But what exactly does this mean?
Written by:
Expertly reviewed by:
Christin Schneider
Expert for Immigration law

Share:

Turkish plaintiff demands extension of residence permit

The case was brought by a man from Turkey who was born in 1983. He came to Germany as a child as part of family reunification. However, his temporary Residence permit expired in 2015.

He was initially refused an extension - because of his links to an Islamist group, which he has since renounced and is cooperating with the police.

During an attempted deportation in 2017, the man applied for asylum. However, the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) rejected this application as "manifestly unfounded". As a result, the Foreigners' office also refused to extend his residence permit - with reference to Section 10 (3) AufenthG.

To explain: Section 10 (3) of the Residence Act states that a new residence permit may not be issued if an asylum application has been rejected as "manifestly unfounded".

Our recommended reading
http://§%2010%20AufenthG%20einfach%20erklärt%20–%20Ihr%20Aufenthaltstitel%20bei%20Asylantrag
§ Section 10 AufenthG simply explained - Your Residence permit for asylum applications

§ Section 10 of the Residence Act (AufenthG) is a key paragraph that regulates the granting or exclusion of residence permits during asylum proceedings. ...

This is how the court ruled

The plaintiff argued in court that he was not seeking a new residence permit, but an extension of his previous one. Section 10 (3) AufenthG could therefore not apply.

The Federal Administrative Court upheld the man's claim - at least in principle. A rejected asylum application does not automatically prevent the extension of an existing residence permit. The decisive factor is the difference between (new) granting and extension.

However, the court also made it clear that the plaintiff did not meet all the special requirements for an extension of residence under Section 35 AufenthG.

This means that the Foreigners' office may not refuse to extend the man's residence permit on the basis of Section 10 (3) AufenthG - but it may refuse to do so under Section 35 AufenthG.

Whether he can instead be granted a discretionary residence permit(Section 34 (3) AufenthG) must now be examined by the Higher Administrative Court in further proceedings.

Our recommended reading
http://Abschiebungshaft%20nach%20§%2062%20AufenthG%20–%20Voraussetzungen,%20Haftarten%20und%20Ihre%20Rechte
Detention pending deportation according to § 62 AufenthG - Requirements, types of detention and your rights

§ Section 62 of the Residence Act (AufenthG) regulates the requirements and framework conditions for detention pending deportation in Germany. This provision is crucial for people who are required to leave the country and can be detained to ensure their deportation....

Conclusion: What the ruling means for migrants in Germany

The ruling provides clarity for people whose residence permit expires and who have also submitted an unsuccessful asylum application.

  • A rejected asylum application does notautomatically blockthe extension of a residence permit.
  • The difference between granting (new application) and renewal (continuation of existing status) is important.
  • Nevertheless, all other requirements for a residence permit must be met - such as a secure livelihood, a valid passport and no serious grounds for deportation.

With its decision, the Federal Administrative Court strengthens legal certainty for many migrants in Germany. At the same time, the ruling makes it clear that extensions always depend on the individual case. Anyone who finds themselves in a similar situation should seek legal advice at an early stage.

Do you have any questions?
Are you experiencing difficulties with the naturalization process and still have questions? Contact us and our legal experts will be happy to help you with any question!
anna profile picture
Anna Faustmann
Editor
Anna Faustmann is an editor at Migrando . With her sound education and many years of experience in journalism and digital marketing, she brings a deep understanding of the conception and creation of ...