Various cookies are used on our website: technical cookies, cookies for marketing purposes and cookies for analysis purposes; in principle, you can also visit our website without cookies being set. This does not apply to technically necessary cookies. You can view and change the current settings at any time by clicking on the fingerprint that appears (bottom left). You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time. Further information can be found in our privacy policy under Cookies. By clicking on "Accept all", you agree that we may set the aforementioned cookies for marketing and analysis purposes.

The picture shows a person making a payment with a bank card. This is reminiscent of a recent court ruling concerning the issue of a special payment card for asylum seekers.

Court ruling: payment card for asylum seekers unlawful!

The Hamburg Social Court has ruled that the payment card for asylum seekers is unlawful. This ruling could bring major changes to the German social system and trigger a debate on social benefits.
Written by:
Christin Schneider
Expert for Immigration law

Share:

Background and problems with the payment card

Since this year, the payment card has been issued to asylum seekers in Hamburg and other German cities. This card, which was originally introduced to simplify the administration of social benefits and prevent abuse, has been controversial since its introduction. Critics complain that the payment card discriminates against asylum seekers and restricts their personal freedom by denying them access to cash.

The judgment of the Hamburg Social Court

On July 24, 2024, the Hamburg Social Court ruled that payment cards instead of cash are illegal. The Tagesspiegel reports on this, citing Pro Asyl and the Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, which provided information on the ruling.

The court says that the lack of access to cash violates the dignity of asylum seekers. Asylum seekers should be able to decide for themselves how they spend their money. The court sees this as a violation of the fundamental rights set out in the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany.

The view of asylum seekers

This ruling is good news for many asylum seekers. Mahmoud from Syria says: "The payment card restricted me. I couldn't shop everywhere and was often dependent on help. Cash gives me more freedom and dignity." Amina from Eritrea adds: "With cash, I can decide for myself how I want to spend my money. The payment card treated me like a second-class person. The ruling shows that our rights are important."

Reactions to the ruling

Opinions on the verdict vary. Human rights organizations and lawyers who supported the lawsuit are pleased with the ruling. They say: "The ruling ensures that asylum seekers in Germany are treated fairly and receive their social benefits in a way that respects their dignity."

However, some politicians and administrative staff do not agree. They fear that cash payments could make administration more complicated and lead to abuse. They say that payment cards are an important tool for controlling and increasing efficiency in the social system.

Consequences and outlook

The ruling of the Hamburg Social Court has major implications for social policy in Germany. Many cities and municipalities will probably have to rethink and perhaps change their practice of issuing payment cards. The ruling could also trigger a debate on social benefits for asylum seekers at federal level.

The Hamburg social welfare authorities have announced that they will review the ruling and consider possible appeals. However, the payment cards will remain in use until final clarification.

Free test

Check your requirements for Settlement permit and Naturalization online.